Independent advisory across the four domains that determine whether your organization can enter, compete in, and grow within regulated and federally contracted markets.
We evaluate your systems, payment flows, API surfaces, and client-side code against real-world threat patterns — not just checkbox compliance. Our security assessments identify vulnerabilities before auditors or adversaries do, and deliver findings in language that enables both engineering remediation and executive decision-making.
Assessment scope is defined to fit your context: a targeted payment architecture review, a client-side injection surface analysis, a credential and secret exposure audit, or a broader controls gap assessment mapped to NIST SP 800-171, CMMC, or FedRAMP requirements.
Federal contracting opportunities require demonstrable compliance maturity — and the path from current state to contract-eligible is rarely obvious. We map your obligations accurately, scope your applicable level, and build a sequenced roadmap that gets you assessment-ready without overbuilding.
Our compliance advisory covers CMMC 2.0 (Levels 1 and 2), FCI and CUI classification and scoping, SPRS assessment preparation, System Security Plan development, POAM management, and SOC 2 readiness — with guidance that translates regulatory language into organizational action.
Personal and sensitive data creates liability wherever it moves — across APIs, into third-party processors, through redirect URLs, and into logging systems that were never designed to hold it. We identify where your data boundaries are breaking down, what is being exposed and to whom, and what controls bring you into alignment with applicable privacy requirements.
Privacy engagements cover PII exposure mapping, data minimization evaluation, third-party data leakage identification, CUI handling requirements under federal frameworks, and alignment to GDPR, CCPA, and the NIST Privacy Framework.
Trust is not declared — it is demonstrated through consistent ethical conduct, transparent communication, and the professional discipline to handle sensitive findings without creating new risks. Our engagements are conducted with the same standards whether the scope is formal or not.
We advise organizations on establishing responsible disclosure programs, building vendor notification workflows, and communicating security findings to leadership and external stakeholders in ways that build credibility rather than create alarm. When findings must be delivered outside a formal engagement, we model the professional standard for how that is done.
Every engagement produces findings that can be acted on — by engineers, by compliance leads, and by the leadership making investment and contracting decisions. If your organization needs clarity on where it stands and what it takes to move forward, we should talk.
Start a Conversation